Viltrox AF 24mm f/1.8 vs Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 – digitalcameras.ie

One of many few firms that makes third-party, autofocus lenses for Nikon Z (and for Sony E) is Viltrox, a Chinese language firm centered on prime lenses. The AF 24mm f/1.8 and AF 35mm f/1.8 caught my eye, and I examined them side-by-side within the area and within the lab. Right here’s what I discovered.

Preliminary Issues

The principle distinction between these two lenses isn’t their construct high quality or optical efficiency. It’s, in fact, the focal size.

I’d encourage you to decide on between the Viltrox AF 24mm f/1.8 and Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 based mostly on focal size relatively than some other concerns. As you’ll see in a second, they’re fairly comparable performers, anyway. However as a result of I used each lenses head-to-head fairly extensively, I felt that it could be value writing a devoted comparability in case you’re nonetheless on the fence.

When it comes to bodily building, the 2 lenses have very comparable construct high quality and design, with an all-metal building, a clickless aperture scale, and no climate sealing. Each lenses really feel stable and durable in-hand, however their sparse designs are about what you’d anticipate for such cheap lenses.

Talking of worth, the Viltrox AF 24mm f/1.8 and Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 each price $380. I’d really argue that this can be a level in favor of the Viltrox 24mm f/1.8. Typically talking, 24mm primes are usually dearer than 35mm primes, and there’s an even bigger market of 35mm primes to select from as effectively.

Even the load and dimension of the 2 lenses are mainly similar. Each lenses weigh 370 grams (0.82 kilos) for the Nikon Z model and 340 grams (0.75 kilos) for the Sony E model. The 35mm lens is a hair longer than the 24mm lens – 4 millimeters to be actual. Within the area, I stored pulling the improper lens out of my bag as a result of they seemed mainly interchangeable!

Picture High quality

1. Vignetting

Each lenses have important vignetting wide-open, however the 35mm f/1.8 is best than the 24mm f/1.8 right here (by about 1/3 of a cease). That sample holds as you cease down. The 35mm f/1.8 reaches negligible vignetting ranges by about f/4, whereas the Viltrox 24mm f/1.8 nonetheless has noticeable vignetting even on the narrowest apertures of f/11 and f/16.

2. Distortion

The 2 lenses measure nearly precisely the identical stage of distortion within the lab: 0.83% pincushion on the 24mm lens, and 0.80% pincushion on the 35mm lens. Nonetheless, in follow, the Viltrox AF 24mm f/1.8’s distortion is extra of a wavy, mustache-like form that’s more durable to appropriate in post-processing. The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8’s pincushion distortion is much more common in form, so I’d give it the nod on this comparability.

3. Lateral Chromatic Aberration

Viltrox has finished a extremely spectacular job protecting chromatic aberration to the naked minimal on each lenses! Though the degrees are a bit increased on the 24mm f/1.8, it’s nonetheless low sufficient to be negligible.

4. Sharpness

The 2 lenses have been extraordinarily comparable up to now. Might sharpness be the deciding issue?

Each lenses have acceptable sharpness – nothing nice, however we’ve seen worse. The 24mm f/1.8 reaches increased highs, but additionally reaches decrease lows. The 35mm f/1.8 is extra constant throughout the body. Each lenses have excessive ranges of area curvature that may result in uncommon leads to a lab setting, such because the corners showing sharper than the midframes.

Conclusion and Suggestions

Each lenses have nearly an similar building and intensely comparable optical efficiency. So, all of it comes right down to what I discussed firstly: select based mostly on the focal size that you just want!

The Viltrox AF 24mm f/1.8 is a stable possibility should you want a third-party, autofocus 24mm lens on a funds. In the meantime, I believe that the case for the Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 is barely weaker, since there are extra 35mm options available on the market at the moment.

However both manner, you’re mainly getting the identical efficiency, simply at a special focal size. Neither lens will win any data of their efficiency, however they’re promoting for a great worth of $380, they usually don’t have any deadly flaws (besides, presumably, the shortage of climate sealing should you plan to shoot in excessive environments).

You’ll be able to examine the present costs, and assist my testing efforts at Pictures Life, on the following B&H affiliate hyperlinks:

Let me know within the remark part when you have any questions on these two lenses! I’ve used them each within the area extensively and can be joyful to assist.